Running Workflow Generates Mixed Content Flag

Permanently deleted user

13. August 2014 19:28

We're in the process of our initial deployment. Our websites and workflows work fine in Firefox but generate a 'Display Mixed Content' dialog box when we use our institutional default browser (IE9). We are working with the Silverlight viewer due to the limitations of the IE9 implementation. Our site is secured with the PKI and all calls need to use the https protocal.

When I run the network capture on the initial workflow request I get several calls to (http://www.arcgis.com) www.arcgis.com and utility.arcgis.com which appear to be causing the mixed content problem.

Please see below for the trace and URIs generated by the workflow call.

We have made the published updates to the Silverlight and Essentials config files.

Anyone know how to mitigate this problem other than a security setting change (which I cannot do)?

 

Doug Osborne

 

>>URL Method Result Type Received Taken Initiator Wait?? Start?? Request?? Response?? Cache read?? Gap??

 

http://www.arcgis.com/clientaccesspolicy.xml GET 304 application/xml 146 B 47 ms  4898 0 47 0 0 265404

 

/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/sites/Real_Property/workflows/Find_Outgrant/run?ts=635435142197718776&v=3.0 POST 200 text/plain 10.04 KB 218 ms  4898 0 171 0 0 265233

 

/ArcGIS/rest/services/base_map/MapServer/export?bbox=1016510.42713236%2c1463356.43402777%2c1057873.99866282%2c1498078.65625&size=928%2c779&dpi=96&format=png32&transparent=true&imageSR=2261&bboxSR=2261&layers=show%3a0%2c3%2c4%2c5%2c6%2c8%2c9%2c11%2c12%2c13%2c14%2c15%2c18%2c19%2c20%2c21%2c23%2c24%2c25%2c26%2c27&f=image& GET 200  241.97 KB 4.00 s  4945 0 3994 15 0 261395

 

/ArcGIS/rest/services/RealProp/MapServer/export?bbox=1016510.42713236%2c1463356.43402777%2c1057873.99866282%2c1498078.65625&size=928%2c779&dpi=96&format=png24&transparent=true&imageSR=2261&bboxSR=2261&layers=show%3a2&f=image& GET 200 image/png 15.65 KB 0.57 s  4945 0 577 0 0 264827

 

http://www.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/arcgis/rest/services/utilities/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198088813& GET 301 text/plain 398 B 125 ms  4945 15 110 0 0 265279

 

http://www.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/ArcGIS/rest/services/RealProp/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198108815& GET 301 text/plain 397 B 125 ms  4960 0 125 0 0 265264

 

http://www.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/ArcGIS/rest/services/base_map/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198128817& GET 301 text/plain 397 B 125 ms  4960 0 125 0 0 265264

 

http://www.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/ArcGIS/rest/services/Imagery/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198138818& GET 301 text/plain 396 B 110 ms  4960 0 110 0 0 265279

 

http://utility.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/arcgis/rest/services/utilities/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198088813& GET 200 text/plain 275 B 5.35 s  5070 0 5351 0 0 259928

 

http://utility.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/ArcGIS/rest/services/Imagery/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198138818& GET 200 text/plain 275 B 5.27 s  5070 0 5273 0 0 260006

 

http://utility.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/ArcGIS/rest/services/RealProp/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198108815& GET 200 text/plain 275 B 5.33 s  5085 16 5320 0 0 259928

 

http://utility.arcgis.com/sharing/tools/legend?soapUrl=https://mapsrus.drum.army.mil/ArcGIS/rest/services/base_map/MapServer&returnbytes=true&f=json&_ts=635435142198128817& GET 200 text/plain 275 B 5.33 s  5085 16 5320 0 0 259928

 

0

• 

  Permanently deleted user

  14. August 2014 19:10

  In further investigation we've seen the mixed Content flag is raised with the workflow container and the "run external Command" container. Removing these containers from the workflow is a successful work around but limits the functionality of the workflow we create.

  How do we eliminate the out of context references that are generating the security flag?

   

   

  0

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.