How many of you run Geo cortex Essentials on its own server?
As the title says, how many of you run Geocortex Essentials on its own server. Currently it runs on our AGS Server but I'd like to know if I can get a performance boost from giving it its own server. Please help me out if you have experience.
0
-
It honestly depends more on AGS and the number of services than Geocortex. We run AGS on it's own server due to the overhead of AGS processes. Our general rule is that if you have less than 50 concurrent users, then both AGS and Geocortex is okay on a single well-provisioned server. Over 50, we recommend to our clients to run AGS on a separate server typically with AGS Web Adaptor and Geocortex on the same server. There are lots of different scenarios here and it's rare that we have clients with the same configuration.
Our Geocortex/AGS Web adaptor is 4CPU/16GB RAM VM, whereas our AGS server is 4CPU/64GB RAM VM.0 -
@Tom, Thanks for the nice spec recommendation (A really cool thing to do!) When we hit our next growth spurt we plan to break Geocortex out to its own server as well. 0 -
We run AGS and Geocortex on the same server as well and have the kind of user base Tom describes (we get a lot of traffic between everything, but not concurrently).
Our Geocortex/AGS/AGS Web Adaptor is a virtual Windows 2012 R2 server with 4 CPU (3.07 GHz) and 24 GB of RAM. We had been running with 16 GB for a while but bumped it up as we added more map services.
We could run them all with 16 GB RAM, but when we did we were typically running above 75% consumption, which I remember hearing at an Esri UC presentation wasn't recommended and could contribute to slow performance.0 -
We run 2 Geocortex servers, which are load balanced by Netscaler. We aim for HA as best we can given we're in an Emergency Services environment. We have Dual core servers with 8GB of memory for each GE server, which is a relatively low spec. Our AGS servers (x4) are all quad core with 24GB of RAM. We can get pretty high usage on the application through our summer fire season, and we don't normally see too many issues with Geocortex servers, they normally pur along nicely. It's the AGS boxes that cop the brunt of the requests. Although we don't do a lot of in-built reporting and or printing. These tasks are offloaded to their own Geoprocessing servers. All I can say when planning.. spec up the mapping servers! 0
Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.
Kommentare
4 Kommentare