Zum Hauptinhalt gehen

Not All Feature Service Points are Displayed when Zoomed Out

Kommentare

4 Kommentare

  • Permanently deleted user
    have you checked the placement properties in the feature before you publish it? have you checked the display settings in GE manager?
    0
  • Denise Beckham
    Hello Sylvia,

     

    I apoligize for my delayed response.  What do you mean by "placement properties"?  Is there a setting in Feature Access properties that controls how many features can be controlled at a time?

     

    I don't have any definition queries set on this data.  In Geocortex, I have it in a data catalog.  I have it set to cluster by default, but since it is a data catalog, it does not cluster when you first add it to the map.  But I tried turning off clustering, and that made no difference.
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    Hi Denise,

     

    We're probably hitting the feature limits on how many features we can get out of ArcGIS Server.  When you add the service as a Map Server, ArcGIS will draw an image with all the points it can find in the data.  When it's added as a Feature Layer, we must download all those points individually.

     

    ArcGIS Server defaults to returning 1000 features per request.  I believe that the client API will divide up the requests by screen region so it's not a hard limit on what you can see, but if you have tens of thousands of points we're still going to hit those limits.

     

    When you identify, a new query is sent that would get the missing points.

     

    In order to ensure that all of your desired points are returned by the server, you should either bump up the Maximum number of records returned by the server value (see https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/latest/publish-services/windows/setting-map-service-properties.htm), configure the layer to only be visible at scales where there are fewer than 1000 visible features, or both.  That way, when you are building a heat map or a cluster, we will use all of the features.

     

    Regards,

     

    -Malcolm
    0
  • Denise Beckham
    Okay, that makes sense.  Thank you, Malcolm!
    0

Bitte melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen.